Comparison
AimfoxAimfox

CampaignStack vs Aimfox, compared for agencies

Aimfox is the only tool in this set that will rent you the LinkedIn profiles as well as the software: three warmed accounts for $387 a month, delivered in a few days and swapped if one gets banned. Underneath that it is a capable cloud sender at $49 a seat, with proxies in 60 countries, weekly limit sliders you can actually see, real white label on your own domain, and an MCP server with its own setup guide for Claude. The differences are the second channel and what reads a draft before it sends. The biggest one is whose name is on the profile doing the sending. Here is the honest side-by-side.

Pick Aimfox when

You need more sending identities than you have people, and renting beats recruiting. Nobody else sells that: $387 a month buys three profiles Aimfox built and warmed, live in one to three business days, editable down to the headline and banner, and a banned one replaced in one to two. The rest of the product holds up on its own. $49 a seat is among the lower prices here, proxies across 60 countries and more than 10,000 addresses are included and picked for you, the Agency plan puts 20 seats and full white label on your own domain at $499, and the MCP server is documented for Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Codex and Raycast.

Pick CampaignStack when

Email is half the sequence and you want it in the same graph instead of handed to Instantly. Or you want the layer that decides: ICP scoring and live buying signals picking who gets contacted, a critic reading every draft before a human sees it, a review queue holding the doubtful ones, and daily ceilings measured from what the account really did on LinkedIn rather than set on a slider. And when every profile sending has to belong to a real person, because that is what LinkedIn asks for in writing.

Side by Side

What each tool actually does

Capabilities as documented by each vendor, checked September 2026. Aimfox's rented profiles and its published limit sliders are real; so are the structural differences below.

CapabilityAimfoxCampaignStack
Account safety limits
Weekly sliders from 10 to 200 for connection requests, message requests and InMails, a warm-up set to 7, 14 or 30 days, and safe daily numbers calculated from both
Per-action-type daily budgets, usage-based warm-up, weekly caps, business-hours pacing, automatic risk pause, and today's ceiling reduced by whatever the account did outside CampaignStack
Rented LinkedIn profiles
$387 a month for three profiles Aimfox created and warmed. Its help center states they "have been created by Aimfox and are not associated to real people" and stay locked to the platform; a banned one is swapped in one to two business days
Not offered. LinkedIn's user agreement lists creating a profile for anyone other than yourself as a Don't, so every account here belongs to a real person who connected it
LinkedIn outreach
Connection requests, messages, free InMail and message requests to group members and event attendees, run from the cloud, with voice notes, auto-translate and sends timed to the lead's timezone
Connection requests, messages, InMail and engagement through a persistent cloud browser per account; Sales Navigator is optional
Native email sending
LinkedIn only. Its own integrations page sends email through Instantly, Smartlead, EmailBison or Masterinbox, each a separate subscription and a separate inbox
Gmail sending with its own daily budgets and warm-up, inside the same workflow graph
LinkedIn session handling
A Chrome extension reuses the browser session so no password is typed, or you sign in with the LinkedIn email and password instead; proxies across 60 countries and over 10,000 addresses are included and assigned for you
Session cookie is consumed into an encrypted browser profile on our server and never stored in the database; optional recovery credentials are opt-in and encrypted
AI-drafted messages
AI Variables put a prompt behind a magic wand that writes a line or rewrites the whole message per target; nothing is documented for drafting replies to inbound conversations
Openers, follow-ups and inbound replies drafted against your playbook and the lead's live context
Quality control on AI drafts
No quality loop is documented, and the AI Variables article describes no preview or approval between the model writing and the message sending
A critic reads every draft against its full brief and objects; drafts that keep failing are flagged for a human
Human review queue
Campaigns run once launched. The Unibox is where a team reads replies across profiles, not where outbound gets approved
A persistent, skippable queue where you approve, edit, retry or reject, and approving resumes the withheld action
Buying signals
Post engagers, group members and event attendees are audience sources chosen when a campaign is built, not a standing detector for job changes, funding or hiring
Job changes, title changes, post engagement, funding and headcount changes feed campaign scoring
ICP scoring
Advanced audience filters narrow a list before launch; nothing scores a person against the campaign afterwards
Every lead is scored against every campaign's ICP; the score decides campaign membership
API and AI agents
REST API with read-only or full keys, 18 webhook events, two n8n community nodes, and an MCP server over OAuth with setup guides for Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Codex and Raycast
MCP server with over 200 tools; an AI agent can operate the entire platform
White-label
Agency plan only: a client dashboard on your own domain once a DNS record validates, branded logins and reports, and a custom sender address on transactional email
Workspace branding on client-facing reports; no custom domain and no client login yet
Pricing model
$49 a month per seat, where a seat is one LinkedIn account running campaigns; Agency from $499 for 20 seats and $20 for each one after; Avatars $387 for three profiles, no trial
$299/mo per client workspace ($249 annual), 25,000 credits included; LinkedIn accounts and team members are not billed per seat

Every limit in the first row is published with the mechanism behind it: the daily budget per account, the warm-up ramp, the weekly cap, and what happens when LinkedIn pushes back. See the account safety numbers

01 · Credit Where Due

Where Aimfox is genuinely strong

Aimfox has built the thing every agency at scale eventually asks for. When a client wants twenty sending identities and has four employees, no amount of sequencing software fixes that, and Aimfox is the only vendor here that answers it directly: rent the profiles, warmed and ready, and plug them into a campaign. Delivery is one to three business days, a banned profile is replaced in one to two, and the headline, banner, position and skills are yours to edit.

The rest of it is built out too. Proxies across more than 60 countries and 10,000 addresses come with the subscription and are chosen for you, which closes the login-location gap that gets a connected account challenged. The Agency plan at $499 for 20 seats is real white label, on your own domain after a DNS check, with branded client logins and a custom sender address on transactional email. That is deeper than what CampaignStack offers today, and if branded client access is the product you sell, that row alone may settle it.

02 · The Avatar Question

Whose name is on the profile

Two sentences decide this one, and both are published by the companies involved. Aimfox's help center, describing what you rent: the profiles "have been created by Aimfox and are not associated to real people." LinkedIn's user agreement, under its list of Don'ts: "Create a false identity on LinkedIn, misrepresent your identity, create a Member profile for anyone other than yourself (a real person)." Aimfox's own avatars page frames the purpose as going "past the LinkedIn limits."

Read those together and price the risk yourself. The profiles are, in Aimfox's words, "purposefully restricted to the Aimfox platform," so the sending capacity you rent is not an asset you keep; cancel and it stays behind. And a replacement guarantee measured in business days tells you what the expected failure is, and that the vendor has already priced it happening.

CampaignStack does not rent profiles and will not add them. Every account it sends from is one a real person connected and can disconnect. That is a smaller ceiling, and it is the ceiling LinkedIn's terms describe.

03 · Where The Numbers Come From

A slider is not a measurement

Aimfox is more open about limits than most of this category. You set weekly ceilings between 10 and 200 for connection requests, message requests and InMails, pick a warm-up of 7, 14 or 30 days, and it works out the safe daily numbers from both and spreads them across the week. Anyone who has used a tool that silently offers 75 invitations a day will recognise how much better that is.

The gap is what a slider cannot see. It knows what Aimfox sent. It does not know that your client spent Tuesday morning sending thirty connection requests by hand from the LinkedIn app, and LinkedIn counts those against the same account. CampaignStack reads each account's previous complete day back from LinkedIn, subtracts activity it did not cause from today's ceiling, and sets the warm-up floor from the account's own trailing 28 days rather than a speed you picked at setup. When the first security check lands, the affected action family pauses for 24 hours on its own while replies to people who wrote in keep going.

04 · The Decision Layer

Aimfox sends the list. Something has to pick it.

Aimfox executes well and decides nothing. Advanced filters narrow an audience the day you build the campaign, and after that the list is fixed: nobody is added because they changed jobs last week, nobody is dropped because they left the role you targeted, nothing reacts to the funding round that makes the timing right. AI Variables will personalise the message, and no second pass reads what the model wrote before it reaches the prospect. There is no queue where a doubtful draft waits for a human.

That layer is what CampaignStack is. Signals update lead records as they happen, ICP scores decide campaign membership rather than a filter you set in March, every draft faces a critic that objects in one concrete sentence and forces a rewrite, and anything still failing is flagged and parked for a person. Email lives in the same graph instead of a second subscription. Both tools expose an MCP server, so compare them on what an agent can reach: Aimfox gives it campaigns, leads, templates, conversations and webhooks; CampaignStack adds the scoring, the signals and the review queue, across over 200 tools.

CampaignStack vs Aimfox: common questions

Is Aimfox cheaper than CampaignStack?

Under about six LinkedIn accounts, yes. Aimfox charges $49 a month per seat and a seat is one LinkedIn account running campaigns, so six accounts is $294 against $299 per client workspace here, with no per-seat charge for the accounts or the people inside it. The seventh account is where the lines cross. Its Agency plan then swings the comparison back hard: $499 buys 20 seats you can spread across client workspaces, where ten client workspaces here is ten subscriptions. If what you sell is seats, Aimfox is cheaper at agency scale and it is not close. Count what you would pay separately for email, signals, scoring and drafting before you total either column.

What is an Aimfox Avatar, and is renting a LinkedIn profile allowed?

An Avatar is a LinkedIn profile Aimfox created and warmed, rented at $387 a month for three, delivered in one to three business days and replaced in one to two if it gets banned. Two published sentences answer the second half. Aimfox's help center says the profiles "have been created by Aimfox and are not associated to real people." LinkedIn's user agreement lists "create a false identity on LinkedIn, misrepresent your identity, create a Member profile for anyone other than yourself (a real person)" among its Don'ts. CampaignStack does not rent profiles; every account it sends from belongs to a real person who connected it.

Does Aimfox send email?

No. Aimfox is LinkedIn only, and its own integrations page routes email through Instantly, Smartlead, EmailBison or Masterinbox. That is a second subscription, a second place a reply can land, and a seam between the LinkedIn step and the email step in the same sequence. CampaignStack sends Gmail natively inside the same workflow, with its own daily budgets and warm-up, so both channels are branches of one graph and both sets of replies arrive in one inbox.

Does Aimfox have an MCP server?

Yes, and it is one of the better agent surfaces in this category. It connects over OAuth, refreshes its own tokens, and has setup guides for Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Codex and Raycast, covering accounts, campaigns, leads, labels, templates, conversations, analytics, webhooks and blacklists. There is also a REST API with read-only or full keys and 18 webhook events. CampaignStack's MCP server exposes over 200 tools and reaches what Aimfox has no equivalent for: ICP scoring, buying signals, the review queue, and craft tools that write a message and have a critic read it before a human sees it.

Who decides the LinkedIn limits in each tool?

In Aimfox you do, on a slider: 10 to 200 a week for connection requests, message requests and InMails, plus a warm-up of 7, 14 or 30 days, from which it calculates safe daily numbers. That is more than most vendors here publish. In CampaignStack the numbers are measured rather than chosen. Each account's previous complete day is read back from LinkedIn, activity CampaignStack did not cause is subtracted from today's ceiling, and the warm-up floor comes from the account's own trailing 28 days. The difference shows up the Tuesday your client sends thirty invitations by hand: a slider has no way to know, and a measurement does.

Can I migrate from Aimfox to CampaignStack?

Yes, with one thing that does not come with you. Export your leads from Aimfox as CSV, which its advanced filters will write for you, and import them here. Your own LinkedIn accounts reconnect with a session cookie in about two minutes each, with no password handover. Campaigns rebuild as workflows and the templates cover the connect-then-message shapes, so most agencies rebuild a client in under an hour. Avatars do not transfer: Aimfox states they are "purposefully restricted to the Aimfox platform," so any rented profile stays behind when the subscription ends, and so does whatever network it built.

Will running Aimfox or CampaignStack get my clients' accounts restricted?

No tool can promise it will not. LinkedIn does not publish its limits, and its help center says automated activity can lead to a temporary or permanent restriction. What we can show is the mechanism: connection requests capped at 3% of the account's connections per day under a weekly cap of 100 to 200, a warm-up that starts at 10% of the limit, business-hours pacing with a per-account start time that moves daily, one static residential proxy and one encrypted browser profile per account, and a pause of the challenged action family on the first security check. Every number is on the safety page. Aimfox publishes its sliders and its warm-up speeds, which is the right comparison to make; the question to carry into it is what happens on the days nobody moved the slider.

Get started

Your clients' next meetings start here.

Connect an account, describe the customer, and the first drafts are waiting the next morning. Approve them by hand until you would rather not.