CampaignStack vs Sinky, compared for agencies
Sinky, until recently CopilotCRM, is the cheapest multichannel kit in this set: LinkedIn, email and WhatsApp sequences, a 210-million-contact B2B database, email and phone finders, a unified inbox with AI-suggested replies, an automatic pipeline and a daily copilot that tells you whom to contact, from 49 euros a month before tax with one channel included, and 5 euros a month for each extra LinkedIn account. That is a lot of product for the price. The differences are what the site does not say: how an account connects, what the volume limits are, what happens when LinkedIn pushes back, and what reads an AI message before a prospect does. Here is the honest side by side.
One French-speaking operator or a small team wants everything in one tab on a small budget: sourcing from Sales Navigator, CSV, a post's reactors or the built-in database, a sequence that visits, likes, connects and messages, an email or WhatsApp step when the channel matters, an inbox that ranks conversations and suggests the reply, and a pipeline that updates itself. The Team plan puts three seats at 147 euros a month, extra LinkedIn accounts cost 5 euros each, the trial is 7 days, and the vendor migrates your data from another CRM for free. For a solo consultant that is hard to beat on price per feature.
You are running someone else's LinkedIn account and need the safety numbers in writing: budgets per action type computed below LinkedIn's limits, a warm-up from 10%, business-hours pacing with a start time that moves daily, one residential proxy and one encrypted browser profile per account, and an automatic pause on the first security check. Above that, what a copilot's suggestion does not give you: ICP scoring and live signals deciding who gets contacted, a critic reading every AI draft against its brief, a review queue for the doubtful ones, client workspaces over one shared lead database, and an MCP server with over 300 tools.
What each tool actually does
Capabilities as documented by the vendor, checked September 2026. Sinky's breadth at its price is real; so are the structural differences below.
| Capability | Sinky | CampaignStack |
|---|---|---|
| Account safety limits | The LinkedIn page says volumes, delays and action order are controlled and that sequences ramp contact progressively (visit, interact, then connect and message); no numbers, no warm-up curve and no pause behaviour are published, and the site has no help center to check | Per-action-type daily budgets computed below LinkedIn's limits, usage-based warm-up, weekly caps, business-hours pacing, automatic risk pause, invitation hygiene under the pending cap |
| LinkedIn outreach | Profile visits, personalized connection requests, post likes and messages in a sequence, with steps triggered by a like, a comment or an accepted connection; unlimited campaigns on every plan | Connection requests, messages, InMail and engagement through a persistent cloud browser per account, inside a workflow graph |
| Native email sending | Email sequences with open and click triggers and an email finder, on the Starter plan only if email is the one channel you pick; mailbox warm-up and daily sending limits are not documented | Gmail sending with its own daily budgets and warm-up, in the same workflow as the LinkedIn steps |
| Channels beyond LinkedIn and email | WhatsApp sequences with number matching, calls as a step in a multichannel sequence, and Instagram as a connectable account | LinkedIn and email only; calls, SMS and WhatsApp are not channels here |
| LinkedIn session handling | The FAQ says you connect LinkedIn and Instagram to Sinky, one account included and 5 euros a month per extra account; whether that takes a cookie, a password or an extension, and where the session runs, is not documented anywhere on the site, so we will not claim either way | Session cookie is consumed into an encrypted browser profile on our server and never stored in the database; one static residential proxy per account |
| AI-drafted messages | One-click personalized messages from each conversation's history and analysis, AI-suggested replies inside the unified inbox that stay editable, and an option on the agency page to let the AI run conversations end to end | Openers, follow-ups and inbound replies drafted against your playbook, the lead's live context and the sender's own voice |
| Quality control on AI drafts | Suggestions are editable and the FAQ says teams keep full control over what is sent; no second reader that checks a draft against a brief is documented | A critic reads every draft against its full brief and objects; drafts that keep failing are flagged for a human |
| Human review queue | Replies are suggested in the inbox and sent by a person, which is a review by construction; for sequence messages no approval step is documented | A persistent queue where you approve, edit, retry or reject, flagged drafts pinned on top, and approving resumes the withheld action |
| Buying signals | Engagement on your own posts and on the prospect's replies drive the copilot's priorities and the sequence triggers; no watch on a held lead for a job change, funding or headcount change | Job changes, title changes, post engagement, funding and headcount changes are detected on a schedule and feed campaign scoring |
| ICP scoring | Database filters by sector, function, company size and geography at sourcing time, and the copilot ranks conversations by engagement; no score against a defined ICP that gates who enters a sequence | Every lead is scored against every campaign's ICP, and the score decides campaign membership |
| API and AI agents | The FAQ names Zapier, Make and an API for connecting other tools; no API documentation is published, and no MCP server exists | MCP server with over 300 tools; an AI agent can operate the entire platform, including the review queue and the inbox |
| Agency and multi-account operations | Team plan with 3 seats, per-user and per-team views and unlimited seat additions; shareable client dashboards; roles, permissions and multi-account, multi-team access sit on an Enterprise plan the pricing page marks as coming, at 1,470 euros a month for 30 members | Client workspaces over one shared lead database, with per-workspace exclusion lists every consumer honors; LinkedIn accounts are not billed per seat |
| Pricing model | Starter at 49 euros a month before tax with one channel of your choice, Team at 147 euros with 3 seats, Enterprise announced at 1,470 euros with 30 members; one LinkedIn account included and 5 euros a month per extra account; 7-day trial; no annual price is published | $299/mo per client workspace ($249 annual), 25,000 credits included; LinkedIn accounts and team members are not billed per seat |
Every limit in the first row is published with the mechanism behind it: the daily budget per account, the warm-up ramp, the weekly cap, and what happens when LinkedIn pushes back. See the account safety numbers
Where Sinky is genuinely strong
For 49 euros a month, Sinky puts the whole prospecting loop in one screen: five ways to source a list, a sequence that engages before it asks, a second channel when the first goes quiet, an inbox that sorts replies by importance and suggests the answer, a pipeline that moves itself as conversations progress, and a copilot that turns the day into a to-do list. Team seats cost 147 euros for three, an extra LinkedIn account costs 5 euros, and the vendor migrates your leads and history from your old CRM for free. Its own agency customers describe SDRs spending two to three times less per exchange, which is the right thing to sell an agency on.
WhatsApp is a real differentiator in the French market it serves, and the site's line, email to open, LinkedIn to convince, WhatsApp to close, is a coherent sequence design rather than a channel list. The AI suggestions stay editable by design, which the FAQ states plainly: the copilot is an assistant, not a closed automatic system.
Connection, limits and what happens on a block
Read every page on sinky.ai and three things stay unanswered. How a LinkedIn account connects: the FAQ says you connect it and pay 5 euros for a second one, and never says whether that is a cookie, a password or an extension, nor where the session runs or on what IP. What the limits are: the LinkedIn page says volumes, delays and sequencing are controlled and that contact ramps progressively, with no number for any of it. And what happens when LinkedIn challenges an action, which no page addresses. There is no help center to check, so on a client's account you would be finding out in production. The 5-euro extra account is the tell: at that price no proxy, browser profile or per-account infrastructure can be behind it.
CampaignStack answers those three questions in writing. A session cookie is consumed into an encrypted browser profile on our own server, behind one static residential proxy per account, and never stored in the database. Connection requests are capped at 3% of the account's connections per day under a weekly cap of 100 to 200, every action type has a daily budget below LinkedIn's limits, a new account starts at 10% of its cap and earns the rest through use, and sends are paced through business hours from a start time that moves daily. When LinkedIn challenges an action, that family of actions pauses on its own. The numbers are on the safety page, dated.
A copilot suggests. A system decides and checks.
Sinky's AI is a suggestion layer: it proposes a reply in the inbox, ranks conversations, and writes a message from the thread's history. Who enters a sequence is decided by your database filters at sourcing time, and nothing later re-scores a lead against what you actually sell or watches them for a job change or a funding round. When the agency page offers to let the AI run conversations end to end, nothing between the model and the prospect reads the message first.
CampaignStack moves those choices into the system. Every lead is scored against every campaign's ICP and the score gates membership; signals update the score on a schedule; every AI draft passes a critic that reads the full brief and returns one objection before a person sees it; drafts that keep failing pin to the top of a review queue; and the whole platform, inbox and review queue included, is drivable over an MCP server with more than 300 tools. Sinky reaches other tools through Zapier, Make and an undocumented API. For a French solo operator the copilot may be the right amount of machine. For an agency whose name is on the account, the deciding and the checking are the product.
CampaignStack vs Sinky: common questions
Is Sinky cheaper than CampaignStack?
Yes, on every published tier. Sinky's Starter plan is 49 euros a month before tax with one channel of your choice, Team is 147 euros for three seats, and an Enterprise plan is announced at 1,470 euros for 30 members; each LinkedIn account beyond the first adds 5 euros a month, the trial is 7 days, and no annual price is published. CampaignStack is $299 a month per client workspace ($249 annual) with 25,000 credits, and LinkedIn accounts and team members are not billed per seat. What the higher price buys is a browser profile and residential proxy per account, computed safety budgets, ICP scoring, signals, a critic on every draft, a review queue and an MCP server.
Is Sinky the same product as CopilotCRM?
As far as the vendor's own site shows, yes. The homepage FAQ still refers to Copilot.CRM, the customer quotes on the pricing page name CopilotCRM, and the legal notice lists EF Consulting, a company registered in Toulouse, as the editor of sinky.ai. Treat the two names as one product when you compare.
How does Sinky connect to my LinkedIn account?
The site does not say. Its FAQ confirms you can connect LinkedIn and Instagram accounts, one included and 5 euros a month for each extra one, but no page describes whether the connection uses a session cookie, your password or a browser extension, or where the automated session runs. Ask before you connect a client's account. CampaignStack takes a session cookie into an encrypted browser profile on its own server behind one static residential proxy per account, and never stores the cookie in its database.
Does Sinky send email?
Yes. Email sequences with follow-ups triggered by opens, clicks and silence are one of its three channels, alongside LinkedIn and WhatsApp, with an email finder through Fullenrich for addresses you lack. On the Starter plan you choose one channel, so email and LinkedIn together means the Team plan. Mailbox warm-up and daily sending limits are not documented. CampaignStack runs Gmail sequences with their own daily budgets and warm-up in the same workflow as the LinkedIn steps.
Does Sinky have an API or MCP server?
The homepage FAQ says you can connect Sinky to other tools through Zapier, Make or its API, and no API documentation is published on the site as of September 2026. There is no MCP server. CampaignStack's MCP server has over 300 tools and covers the whole platform, including the review queue and the inbox.
Can I migrate from Sinky to CampaignStack?
Yes. Export your leads to CSV and import them here by LinkedIn URL; LinkedIn accounts onboard with a session cookie in about two minutes each. Sequences rebuild from the LinkedIn plus email templates in under an hour per client. What does not transfer: the WhatsApp channel, which CampaignStack does not have, the pipeline stages, and the inbox history inside Sinky. Sinky, for its part, advertises a free migration in the other direction.
Will running Sinky or CampaignStack get my clients' accounts restricted?
No tool can promise it will not. LinkedIn does not publish its limits, and its help center says automated activity can lead to a temporary or permanent restriction. Sinky says its volumes, delays and action order are controlled and that sequences ramp contact progressively, without publishing the numbers. CampaignStack caps connection requests at 3% of the account's connections per day under a weekly cap of 100 to 200, starts a new account at 10% of its limit, paces inside business hours with a per-account start time that moves daily, runs one residential proxy and one encrypted browser profile per account, and pauses the challenged action family on the first security check. Every number is on the safety page.
Can I not just do this with Claude or ChatGPT directly?
Claude or ChatGPT will write you a good message today. What neither can do on its own is hold a LinkedIn session, keep an account under a daily budget, notice that the person replied four days ago, or stop when a meeting gets booked. CampaignStack is those parts. The model writes, the system decides who, when and how many, and a review queue sits in front of every send. If you already run an agent, connect it to the MCP server and it gets the same guardrails.
Every claim about the competitor on this page was checked against these pages on its own site:
Weighing up something else?
Get started
Start building your stack.
Your LinkedIn accounts will be safer with CampaignStack than doing it by hand. That's not a pitch. It's a measurable claim.